Repeated Question

tcp vs https

Got it! Let's focus purely on TCP vs HTTPS (not specific to ClickHouse) using the Problem → Solution → Real-world example format.

If you use TLS with TCP vs TLS with HTTPS, the security level is effectively the same. ✅ Both are equally secure — the difference lies in how they’re used, not how strong they are.

---

💥 Problem

You’re building or integrating a service and need to transfer data between systems (client ↔ server). But you're unsure when to use raw TCP vs HTTPS (HTTP over TLS) for communication.

If you choose the wrong one:

• 🔓 Data may be insecure

• 🧱 You may hit protocol limitations

• 🔄 Your application may not interoperate with other systems

---

✅ Solution

Choose the protocol based on what you need:

Need/Scenario	Use
End-to-end encryption, browser support	✅ HTTPS
Raw, low-level, high-performance transfer	✅ TCP
REST APIs, browser apps, frontend clients	✅ HTTPS
Custom protocols or binary data streams	✅ TCP

Let’s go deeper with real-world examples.

---

🌍 Real-World Examples

🔹 1. Web Application API

Problem: You're building a frontend that fetches data from a backend server.

• You need: cross-platform access, security, and browser compatibility.

Solution: Use HTTPS

• It’s encrypted

• Works in all browsers

• Supports REST, GraphQL, etc.

✅ Real-life:

GET https://api.myshop.com/products

---

🔹 2. Chat Application / Game Server

Problem: You’re building a real-time messaging app or multiplayer game.

• You need: low-latency, persistent connection, fast message delivery.

Solution: Use TCP (or WebSockets, which also ride over TCP)

• Lower overhead than HTTP

• Custom binary protocol possible

• Faster for frequent small messages

✅ Real-life:

Client connects to game.example.com:4567 via raw TCP
Sends and receives binary-encoded game state

---

🔹 3. IoT Device Reporting Data

Problem: IoT sensors must send data to a cloud server securely.

• You need: security (TLS), compatibility with cloud systems.

Solution: Use HTTPS

• Secure against man-in-the-middle

• Easy integration with cloud APIs (AWS, Azure, GCP)

✅ Real-life:

POST https://iot.example.com/submit
Body: {"device_id":"abc","temperature":24}

---

🔹 4. Internal System Communication

Problem: Two internal services (e.g., microservices) on the same network need to exchange high-volume data.

• You want: fast, efficient binary transport without HTTP overhead.

Solution: Use TCP

✅ Real-life:

• gRPC (over HTTP/2 or TCP)

• Database replication traffic

• Redis/Memcached traffic

---

📌 Summary: When to Use What

Use Case	Use TCP?	Use HTTPS?
Browser/API frontend	❌	✅
Custom protocol (game, chat)	✅	❌/WebSocket
IoT data reporting	❌	✅
Internal high-speed services	✅	⚠️ Optional
Public web API	❌	✅
Encrypted file upload	❌	✅

---

🧠 Bonus: Combine Both

Technologies like:

• WebSocket over HTTPS

• gRPC over HTTP/2 (which runs over TCP+TLS)

…give you the flexibility of TCP + the security of HTTPS.

---

Let me know your specific use case (e.g., mobile app, service-to-service call, backend API), and I can suggest the best fit with implementation tips.

why tcp have high performance

Great question!

🧠 Why TCP is High-Performance for Data Transfer

TCP is considered high-performance not because it’s the fastest possible, but because it offers a reliable, low-level, and optimized channel for sending data, especially for custom protocols and long-lived connections.

Let’s break it down:

---

✅ Reasons Why TCP is High-Performance

1. Persistent Connection

• Once a TCP connection is established, it stays open.

• No need to re-establish a new connection for every request (unlike plain HTTP/1.0).

🔄 Result: Fast repeated data exchange without handshake overhead.

---

2. Streaming Data Efficiently

• TCP supports byte-streaming — you can send a continuous stream of data without waiting for a "response" each time.

• No fixed message size or formatting overhead (like HTTP headers or JSON parsing).

🔄 Result: Great for real-time systems (chat, gaming, video streaming).

---

3. Protocol Overhead is Minimal

• Unlike HTTP, which includes headers, cookies, and often extra parsing steps…

• TCP just delivers bytes. Simple and lean.

🔄 Result: Less processing per packet = faster data flow.

---

4. Optimized by the OS & Network Stack

• TCP has built-in congestion control, retransmission, and windowing.

• Decades of tuning means it's highly efficient at using available bandwidth.

🔄 Result: Performs well across varying network conditions.

---

5. Custom Protocols = More Control

• You can build your own lightweight binary protocols on top of TCP.

• Skip the bloat of JSON, HTTP headers, and REST conventions.

🔄 Result: You send exactly what you need, nothing more.

---

🔍 Real-World Examples of TCP Performance

App Type	Why TCP Is Used
Databases	High-throughput query & replication traffic (e.g. MySQL, Postgres, Redis)
Games	Low-latency position updates and events
gRPC	Efficient service-to-service communication (over HTTP/2 on TCP)
Streaming	Audio/video transport over RTSP or raw TCP streams

---

🔁 vs HTTP(S)

Feature	TCP	HTTP/HTTPS
Connection reuse	✅ Yes	❌ No (HTTP/1), ✅ (HTTP/2+)
Headers	❌ None	✅ Always
Custom protocols	✅ Possible	❌ Limited to HTTP rules
Encryption	❌ Plain	✅ HTTPS = TLS over TCP
Performance	✅ Faster	🟡 Slower (more overhead)

---

🧠 TL;DR

TCP is high-performance because it is lightweight, persistent, stream-based, and allows full control over how data is formatted and sent — making it ideal for real-time or high-throughput systems.

Let me know if you want to see a TCP vs HTTP performance test (e.g. with curl, netcat, or code samples).

TLS vs SSL ( tls advance version of ssl and ssl deprecated)

Great question — TLS and SSL are related, but not the same.

---

🔄 Short Answer:

TLS is the modern, secure successor to SSL. SSL is obsolete, and TLS is what everyone uses today — even when people still say “SSL.”

---

🔍 What’s the Difference?

Feature	SSL	TLS
Full name	Secure Sockets Layer	Transport Layer Security
Developed by	Netscape	IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force)
Versions	SSL 1.0 → 3.0	TLS 1.0 → 1.3
Current status	❌ Deprecated (SSL 2.0, 3.0)	✅ Active (TLS 1.2 & 1.3)
Security	Weak, vulnerable	Strong, modern encryption

---

🧠 TLS Replaced SSL

• TLS 1.0 = Upgrade of SSL 3.0

• Browsers, servers, and cloud providers have disabled SSL entirely

• Only TLS 1.2 and 1.3 are used in modern systems

---

🔐 Why Does Everyone Still Say "SSL"?

• Legacy naming: tools and certs still call it "SSL":

  • openssl (OpenSSL CLI)

  • .crt, .key files

  • "SSL certificates" (they're actually used for TLS)

• It’s like saying "dial a number" — even though we don’t use rotary phones anymore.

---

🧪 Real-World Example

✅ Secure TLS handshake:

Client ———[Client Hello: TLS 1.3]——→ Server
Server ———[Server Hello: TLS 1.3]——→ Client

❌ Deprecated SSL:

Client ———[Client Hello: SSL 3.0]——→ Server
Server: ❌ Connection refused or downgraded

---

✅ TL;DR

SSL vs TLS	Verdict
Same thing?	❌ No — TLS replaced SSL
Can I use SSL?	❌ No — insecure, deprecated
Use TLS instead?	✅ Yes — always use TLS 1.2+

---

Let me know if you want help enabling only secure TLS versions on your server or verifying what versions a system supports.

Yes — ✅ all modern websites and ✅ SSL certificate authorities (CAs) actually issue TLS certificates, not SSL certificates.

---

🔍 Clarifying the Terminology

Even though people still say:

• “SSL certificates”

• “Enable SSL”

• “Install SSL certs”

…what they actually mean is:

🔐 A certificate that enables TLS encryption — usually TLS 1.2 or 1.3.

The term “SSL” is just legacy branding.

---

✅ What Certificate Authorities (CAs) Actually Provide

When you get a certificate from:

• Let’s Encrypt

• DigiCert

• GoDaddy

• Sectigo

• Cloudflare

You’re getting a certificate that:

• Uses X.509 format

• Is compatible with TLS 1.2/1.3

• Is not compatible with SSL 2.0 or SSL 3.0, which are long deprecated

---

📦 What's in a TLS Certificate?

An "SSL/TLS certificate" contains:

• Your domain name

• Public key (used in TLS handshake)

• Signature from the Certificate Authority

• Expiration date

• Supported key usages (e.g. encryption, signing)

It’s just a digital identity, used in the TLS protocol.

---

🧠 TL;DR

Question	Answer
Are CAs issuing SSL certificates?	❌ No — the term is outdated
Are they really TLS certificates?	✅ Yes — used with TLS 1.2 or 1.3
Can I use them with SSL 3.0?	❌ No — SSL is disabled in all modern systems
Is the term “SSL cert” wrong?	🟡 Not technically correct, but commonly used

---

So yes — when you get an "SSL certificate," you're getting a TLS certificate behind the scenes.

Let me know if you want to inspect your TLS cert or test what version your site/server is using.

ipv4 vs ipv6

You're asking about the difference between IPv4 and IPv6, and why IPv4 is still more commonly used, even though IPv6 is newer and technically better. Let's break this down.

---

📌 1. Difference Between IPv4 and IPv6

Feature	IPv4	IPv6
Address Size	32-bit (e.g., 192.168.0.1)	128-bit (e.g., 2001:0db8::1)
Total Addresses	~4.3 billion	~340 undecillion (virtually infinite)
Format	Decimal (dot-separated)	Hexadecimal (colon-separated)
Header Size	20 bytes	40 bytes (but more efficient)
Built-in Security	❌ Optional (via IPSec)	✅ Native IPSec support
Configuration	Needs DHCP/manual	Auto-config via SLAAC
NAT Required?	✅ Yes (due to limited IPs)	❌ No (each device can have its own IP)
Broadcasting	✅ Yes	❌ Replaced with multicast

---

🔍 2. Why People Still Use IPv4 More

Despite IPv6 being the superior protocol, IPv4 dominates (~75%+ of the internet) because of:

✅ Legacy Infrastructure

• Most systems, ISPs, routers, and software still rely on IPv4.

• Updating to IPv6 requires massive changes to firewalls, apps, DNS, etc.

✅ Compatibility

• Many older devices and systems don’t fully support IPv6.

• Websites/servers need to be dual-stacked (supporting both).

✅ NAT Workarounds

• IPv4 shortage is managed using NAT (Network Address Translation).

• ISPs can assign one public IP to multiple customers behind NAT.

🧪 Real-world:

• Home routers, servers, and VPNs are still mostly IPv4-based.

• Many cloud providers assign IPv4 by default (with optional IPv6).

---

💡 3. Which One is Better?

Area	Winner	Why
Scalability	✅ IPv6	More addresses, no need for NAT
Security	✅ IPv6	IPSec is native
Performance	🟡 Tie	Depends on network stack and support
Deployment	✅ IPv4	More widely supported today
Simplicity	✅ IPv4	Easier to read and configure

So technically IPv6 is better, but IPv4 wins in practicality — for now.

---

📈 What’s the Future?

• The world is slowly moving to IPv6, especially in:

  • Mobile networks

  • Cloud-native apps

  • IoT devices

• Major services (Google, Facebook, AWS, Azure) already support IPv6.

But full replacement may take many more years, so dual-stack (IPv4 + IPv6) is the current norm.

---

🧠 TL;DR

• IPv4: Older, limited, but widely used and simple.

• IPv6: Newer, more secure and scalable, but not yet universal.

• IPv6 is better, but IPv4 is still dominant because of legacy systems and global infrastructure inertia.

Let me know if you'd like help checking if your device or server supports IPv6!